Sales Assessment allows for use of leading (vs. lagging) indicators
Posted by Cabot Jaffee on Tue, Jun 29, 2010 @ 10:33 AM
Is your sales team run by leading indicators or lagging hindsight? All it takes is a brief look within the talent management practices of the organization to answer this question. According to McKinsey's War for Talent surveys (200 companies, 1200 respondents) the percentage of companies engaged in positive talent leadership action and execution is very small.Indeed, when it comes to talent leadership, most organizations are failing, and failure is easily traceable to a weak mindset and belief. In fact, 72% of managers say that winning the war for talent is critical, yet only 9% are confident that their current actions will lead to a stronger talent pool in the next three years. In summary, the McKinsey survey lists the following as views of senior managers’ beliefs about their own organizations:
- Brings in talented people……….……19%
- Develops people effectively………….3%
- Retains top talent……………….…………8%
- Removes poor performers……........3%
- Knows the A, B, and C players…….16%
Where do you think your company falls? How can you improve your leading indicators?
Accurate information drives effective strategies. This is good news for sales organizations, because, unlike many other functional areas, sales organizations already have great appreciation for accurate information. Operating metrics are a familiar form of sales information and receive intense attention in all sales organizations. But operating metrics alone are not enough. Sales leaders need to be passionately and diligently focused on the knowledge, skills, and abilities (i.e., the competencies) required in all their positions and they need to be likewise focused on the knowledge, skills, and abilities of their incumbents (individual contributors and leadership alike), internal candidates, and external candidates as well. The sales organization with accurate information about their position requirements, and the corresponding level of human capital knowledge, skills, and abilities available to fill those positions, is in the best position to be more strategic and intelligent when making all human capital decisions (i.e., selection, promotion, training, succession planning, performance management, etc.). In this definition, “passionately and diligently” means an unwavering commitment to measure, measure, and measure again. Great sales organizations extend their measurements beyond operational metrics to include significant focus on key human capital metrics: skills, abilities, knowledge, engagement and retention levels, quality-of-hire, ROI, etc. These measures are examples of “leading indicators” that great sales organizations focus on and attend to as they know that such indicators do accurately predict ultimate operating metrics like revenue and profitability. All measurement should be directed at providing better information for improved decision-making.
We have found repeatedly when critical, strategic decision-making is attempted without rigorous attention to the predictive data and metrics, wrong decisions are made which will lead to poor sales performance. If a sales leader can lead their managers and sales people to arrive at a point--mentally (through initial belief and eventual successes) where there is “passionate and diligent focus,” both on the targets that will drive its future success and the competencies needed to drive that success, much progress will have been made in building this core belief. Most great sales organizations share the following beliefs:
- Better Talent equals competitive advantage
- Talent Leadership “Mindset” is the catalyst for action
- Strengthening the talent pool is every leader’s job
- Talent “Gold Standard” has been established (be a role model)
- Leaders, especially senior leaders, must be held accountable for aggressively developing center talent
- Real money must be invested in Talent Leadership
- Talent Review processes are critical
Don’t lag behind without focus on leading indicators. Hindsight with poor results is a position your sales organization does not need to face. Below are only a few of the differences between leading and lagging indicators. Which do you measure?
|
Lagging Indicators
|
Leading Indicators
|
|
Quantity of hires
|
Quality of hires
|
|
End of year results
|
Gap Analysis of results weekly
|
|
Time to fill a position
|
Skills identification and gap analysis of incumbent sales force
|
|
Percent of quota attained
|
Leadership Involvement
|
|
Turnover
|
Identification of “at risk” incumbents
|
|
Objectives Made
|
Engagement Levels
|
For more information on these and other white papers on sales assessment click here.